
Many older cities rapidly expanded during the Industrial Revolution, as workers flocked to the urban centers. As the towns and cities expanded, the residential areas for the workers tended to be in the east, with the middle and upper-classes in the west.
The reason for this is that in much of the northern hemisphere, the prevailing winds are westerlies – blowing from west to east. The massive, unchecked pollution from these early industries would therefore drift eastward, making the air quality much lower in the east end of cities, lowering the desirability (and price) of the housing. Middle classes preferred the cleaner west ends.
The issue was probably even pre-Industrial Revolution, as smoke from personal chimneys would still have caused problems to the east.
In many cities, this will have been compounded – or confused – by the direction of the main river in the environment, which would have been relied on for many uses, including sewerage. London, as an example, displays a massive east/west divide, caused in large part by both early industry and the west-to-east flow of the River Thames.
Smoke image under Creative Commons license, by Flickr user Señor Codo



[...] full post on Hacker News If you enjoyed this article, please consider sharing it! Tagged with: Cities • [...]
In many cities that developed post WWII, you see the more expensive suburbs on the Eastern side. One suggestion for this was that in modern cities, most commuting is done by automobile. Drivers in Western suburbs have the sun in their eyes as they drive to work and the sun in their eyes as they drive home from work.
Churches altar orientations worth a mention http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altar as an early example of earlier
This is interesting data, I’ve always wondered if folks living West of a major city have increased eye problems and skin cancer due to driving to work and back with the sun in their eyes.
I never knew this ..great increase in knowledge
Wasn’t workers’ housing, though, often built practically on top of the heavy industry, rather than downwind of it? For example in London the East is where the docks are – because that’s where the river is wide and that’s the direction of the sea. The East End grew up around the docks.
On the other hand I can see how a previously mixed area in the East might become exclusively working-class as the pollution worsened and those who could, moved West.
While this is true for some cities, it is incorrect in other cases. For example Chicago has a completely concentric structure (Burgess model: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concentric_zone_model).
The reason you state for the structure of cities is called Hoyt’s model, or the sector model (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoyt_model).
[...] Many older cities rapidly expanded during the Industrial Revolution, as workers flocked to the urban centers. As the towns and cities expanded, the residential areas for the workers tended to be in the east, with the middle and upper-classes in the west.Read the article: Why are the East of Cities usually Poorer? [...]
Why are the East of Cities usually Poorer?…
Many older cities rapidly expanded during the Industrial Revolution, as workers flocked to the urban centers. As the towns and cities expanded, the residential areas for the workers tended to be in the east, with the middle and upper-classes in the wes…
[...] (well, on 31 May 2010), a new post called “Why Are the East of Cities Usually Poorer?” was published, which became the #1 link on Hacker News. It stayed there for at least 3-4 [...]
Heh, might have something to do with how things went in East and West Germany.
[...] @hackernewsbot: Why are the east of cities usually poorer?… http://www.thejanuarist.com/why-are-the-east-of-cities-usually-poorer/ [...]
[...] one little example, here is a blog post by Dan Zambonini over at The Januarist about why lower income neighbourhoods in cities are usually [...]
[...] The Januarist Read more on… east, east st. louis, pollution, science (function() { var dsq = [...]
[...] Why are the East of Cities usually Poorer? (via the always kick-ass from Brainpickings) Interesting! I’d always wondered about [...]
hmmm….you see, now there’s an interesting idea about urban planning! I never even considered an explanation like that, as to how cities get designed like that. But then, how do you explain places like Manhattan where the Upper East Side is the Glorified Side?
[...] Why are the East of Cities usually Poorer? – Syy on taivaalla [...]
[...] Why are the East of Cities Usually Poorer? is a super interesting article! It really sounds like a good reason. [...]